MENU

Chapter I-5-4. Court Cases


Table of Contents

SectionTitle
I-5-4-1Morrison, Doe & Decker v. Secretary
I-5-4-1-AModification of Morrison, Doe & Decker Settlement Agreement
I-5-4-4Hyatt v. Apfel
I-5-4-7Polaski, et al. v. Bowen
I-5-4-8-BSmith, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-11Johnson, et.al., v. Sullivan
I-5-4-13Stieberger v. Sullivan
I-5-4-15Campbell, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-16-AWilson, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-17Bailey, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-18Processing Pending Cases Under Samuels
I-5-4-18-AProcessing Retroactive Class Member Cases in Samuels
I-5-4-18-BImplementation of the Regulations Governing the Standards for Consultative Examinations and Existing Medical Evidence and the Evaluation of Symptoms, Including Pain, in Tennessee Disability Cases
I-5-4-18-CProcessing of Samuels “Pipeline” Cases
I-5-4-19Prue/Weathers, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-21McDonald, et al., v. Bowen
I-5-4-21-AMcDonald, et al., v. Bowen
I-5-4-21-BMcDonald et. al. v. Bowen
I-5-4-21-CMcDonald, et. al., v. Bowen
I-5-4-23Avery, et al. v. Secretary of HHS
I-5-4-24Luna, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-25Blankenship, et al., v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
I-5-4-26Boyd, et al. v. Bowen
I-5-4-27Ward, et al., v. Schweiker
I-5-4-28Sullivan v. Zebley
I-5-4-28-AOHA Zebley Readjudication Instructions
I-5-4-29Begley, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-30Determining Disability for a Child Under Age 18 — Title XVI
I-5-4-30-AProcessing Supplemental Security Income Childhood Disability Cases Based on Pub. L. 104-193
I-5-4-30-BProcessing Supplemental Security Income Childhood Disability Redetermination and Age-18 Redetermination Cases Based on Pub. L. 104-193
I-5-4-30-CProcessing Supplemental Security Income Childhood Disability Continuing Disability Review (CDR) Cases Based on Public Law (Pub. L.) 104-193
I-5-4-31Marcus, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-32LaBelle, et al. v. Sullivan
I-5-4-33Implementation of the Gonzalez Acquiescence Ruling
I-5-4-34Verla Turner v. Sullivan
I-5-4-35Martel v. Sullivan
I-5-4-36State of New York v. Sullivan
I-5-4-37Boring v. Sullivan
I-5-4-38Hill v. Sullivan
I-5-4-39Askin v. Shalala
I-5-4-41Rescission of the Schisler Ruling; Use of the “CE/MER” Regulations in the Second Circuit
I-5-4-42Bozzi v. Shalala
I-5-4-43Taylor v. Shalala
I-5-4-44Rosetti v. Shalala
I-5-4-45Cuffee v. Shalala
I-5-4-46Jones v. Shalala
I-5-4-47Medellin v. Shalala
I-5-4-48Sharpe v. Sullivan and Martinez v. Bowen
I-5-4-49Implementation of the Lively Acquiescence Ruling (Fourth Circuit)
I-5-4-50Mason v. Shalala
I-5-4-51Schoolcraft v. Shalala
I-5-4-52Dixon v. Shalala
I-5-4-53Day v. Chater
I-5-4-54S.P. v. Chater
I-5-4-55Adamson v. Chater
I-5-4-56Bentley v. Chater
I-5-4-57Kendrick v. Chater
I-5-4-58Titus v. Chater
I-5-4-59Small v. Chater
I-5-4-60Implementation of the Chavez Acquiescence Ruling (Ninth Circuit)
I-5-4-61Goodnight v. Apfel
I-5-4-62Implementation of the Dennard and Drummond Acquiescence Rulings (Sixth Circuit)
I-5-4-63Laird v. Stilwill
I-5-4-64Ellender v. Schweiker
I-5-4-65Surrell v. Willman
I-5-4-66Implementation of the Albright Acquiescence Ruling (Fourth Circuit)
I-5-4-67Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
I-5-4-68Dut Ban Le v. Barnhart
I-5-4-69Martinez v. Astrue
I-5-4-70Clark v. Astrue
I-5-4-71Padro et al. v. Colvin