Skip to content
Social Security Online
Press Office
Press Office Home This is an archival or historical document and may not reflect current policies or procedures
SSA logo: link to Social Security Online home

BRIEFING ON THE STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS BY GENE SPERLING AND SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS

Meet the Press Office Skip links

Facts And Figures

Press Releases
Congressional Testimonies
SSA Reports
SSA Research

January 27, 1998

BRIEFING ON THE STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS BY GENE SPERLING AND SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS

3:07 P.M. EST





                           THE WHITE HOUSE

                    Office of the Press Secretary

________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release                         January 27, 1998     


             BRIEFING ON THE STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS
                                 BY 
          GENE SPERLING AND SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS

                         The Roosevelt Room


3:07 P.M. EST

	     

	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  We'll go ON BACKGROUND.  
It's not embargoed.  What we're going to do is my colleague is going 
to briefly give you an overview on the speech tonight.  Another 
senior administration official will talk a little bit more in detail 
on the substance.  Gene Sperling will stop by and has the specific 
area of Social Security he wants to talk to you about.  And then 
after that, we'll be happy to take any questions you have about that 
or anything else.  

	     So do you want to go quickly over the speech tonight.

	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Sure.  A lot of what 
has driven the speech, as just a matter of the calendar, the 
President made the final decisions on his budget remarkably early, on 
Christmas Day.  And so policies that are driven by the budget were 
locked in place remarkably early.  That gave him time then -- again, 
almost a month to the day -- to work on the framework to present to 
the country.  

	     And one of the things that he has expressed is that in 
this speech, rather than simply a national to-do list, which is what 
every State of the Union is in good measure, he wanted to set a 
larger philosophical framework of his approach to governing, sort of 
answer the question of, is there Clintonism, or what is Clintonism.  
And the speech -- it's a pretty high bar to set, but I think this 
speech does a good job of meeting that. 

	     He wants to try to express -- and he'll do it in his 
words tonight -- why this approach that he's had now for five years, 
the philosophy that animates it, and obviously he'll briefly touch on 
why and how it has succeeded, and then carrying it forward.  

	     And the construct basically will be very familiar to 
those of you who have covered him over the years: an economy that 
offers opportunity, a society that demands responsibility, a nation 
rooted in community.  And you all have used those words a lot, and so 
has he.  And one of the things that the President wants to do in this 
speech is to make sure that those values are given some meaning.  He 
says, at each critical juncture in American history, we have had to 
change and have new means and methods to advance enduring virtues and 
values.

	     And I think the speech does a very good job of doing 
that, and it, I think, reflects then, going into a new century, a new 
way of using the government as a catalyst for change.  And I think it 
sets a dynamic for the issue terrain going into this new century that 
is much more old-new than left-right.  And I think that's been one of 
the -- as a political person -- one of the innovations of Clintonism.

	     And I'd like my colleague to get into the substance now.


	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Let me spend a few 
minutes and try to give you an overview of what some of the themes of 
the speech will be.  The President will begin by outlining his 
overall strategy to get the economy creating opportunities, and that 
really consists of three pieces.

	     The first part is driving the budget deficit down to 
zero and restoring fiscal responsibility in this country.  We can go 
back to 1993 when the President was elected, the projected deficit 
was $290 billion and projected to skyrocket.  Very tough decisions 
were made and huge progress has been made.  We have a $22 billion 
budget deficit this year and the President will be submitting a 
budget in the next fiscal year that is in balance.  This is a 
tremendous accomplishment.

	     It's a tremendous accomplishment because it has really 
spurred growth in this economy, and the reason for trying to balance 
the budget is not just to get rid of the red ink but to build a 
strong economy.  We have over 15 million jobs that have been created.  
We have an unemployment rate that is the lowest in 24 years.  Family 
incomes are rising; they're up over $2,000 in real terms just since 
1993.  We've had an investment-led recovery that's really succeeding, 
I think, in raising productivity into the future and promoting higher 
living standards.  Brought down interest rates.  Home ownership is at 
the highest level in history.  And the President is going to 
emphasize the importance of maintaining the kind of fiscal discipline 
that has gotten us to where we are.

	     He will talk a bit about the importance of committing 
any budget surpluses that may appear, to hold them until we have 
dealt with Social Security.  And Gene is going to come later and talk 
a bit more about what the President is going to have to say about 
Social Security.  The major message there is going to be that if we 
end up having surpluses -- we don't have them yet, but if we do, 
Social Security is so important, to ensure its financial integrity.  
Until we have done that and accomplished that, we should reserve 
those surpluses.  And Gene will have more to say about Social 
Security. 

	     The second important prong of the economic strategy for 
creating opportunity, of course, is education and training, investing 
in the American people, which is the key to opportunity.  And the 
President will talk about the importance of raising standards, 
raising expectations, raising accountability to make our public 
elementary and secondary schools the best in the world.  Some of the 
things he will call for will be voluntary national testing and 
standards in reading and mathematics.  He will propose putting 
100,000 new teachers who are well qualified into our schools to 
reduce class size to an average of 18 nationally in grades one to 
three.  He'll talk about a school construction tax cut that will be 
designed to rebuild, modernize, build new schools.  He'll talk about 
a mentoring program that will make sure that young people, 
particularly in low-income communities, prepare themselves adequately 
for college and have the information that they need to take advantage 
of the opportunities that are there.  And he's going to point out 
that we now are at a point where really any American who wants to go 
to college can go to college.  

	     He's going to talk about the importance of raising 
standards in the nation's high schools and looking around the country 
and trying to improve practices and then create models that school 
districts around the country can use to perpetuate best practices.

	     The final piece of the economic strategy to create 
opportunity has to do with tearing down trade barriers to open new 
markets for American products and opportunities for American workers 
around the world.  He'll talk about fast track and the need for 
Congress to grant traditional trade negotiating authority so that we 
can take advantage of opportunities to open markets around the world 
to American goods and services where we're extremely competitive, and 
the importance of this to America's future.

	     He will emphasize that, while trade is very good for 
America and stimulates growth, there are workers who are adversely 
affected by it and by change in general; displacement does occur.  
And he will discuss a G.I. Bill for workers to help provide funding 
for training for dislocated workers.

	     He will also emphasize the need to provide support for 
the IMF so they can do the important work that they're doing now in 
Asia.  We have a world economy that is increasingly integrated and we 
have a stake in the well-being and the progress and the growth in 
those countries.  And if they're willing to undertake fundamental 
reforms, we should support those efforts.

	     The next piece of the speech concerns responsibility and 
the importance that the President attaches to creating a society that 
acts responsibly.  Some of the points that he'll mention have to do 
with moving people from welfare to work.  He'll challenge businesses 
to continue joining the 3,000 companies that have already agreed to 
take part in the Welfare to Work Partnership.  He'll discuss 
welfare--to-work housing vouchers to help welfare people move to jobs 
where they're available.  

	     In the area of health care, he'll discuss a health care 
consumer bill of rights that will call for protections that will 
guarantee access to health care specialists, ensure that high-quality 
care is available, that there is access to emergency room services. 

	     In the area of affordable health care, you know that the 
President has already discussed his proposal to allow buy-ins for 
individuals age 62 to 65 in a self-financing manner into Medicare, 
and for displaced workers over age 55 to also have available a buy-in 
option.  The purpose of that is to increase accessibility so that 
some highly affected groups that have difficulty in gaining access to 
quality care, have access but that it would be self-financing.

	     Finally, I think you're already familiar with the child 
care initiatives.  The President will reiterate his plan to improve 
child care for working families and talk about the components of 
that, which include both child care subsidies and also tax credits. 

	     He'll have something to say as well about juvenile crime 
and drugs, talk about the importance of finishing the job of putting 
100,000 police on the streets, and passing a crime bill that would 
crack down on gangs, guns, drugs.

	     Let me turn to the portion on strengthening our 
communities.  The President will put forward a plan that's designed 
to strengthen American communities in a variety of ways.  The first 
component involves investing in our cities to give them the tools and 
opportunities that they need to create an urban renaissance.  Some of 
the components of that plan would be increased funding for 
empowerment zones and for community development banks, as well as 
increased funding for low-income housing tax credits. 

	     There will be an environment component to the speech.  
The President will talk in particular about climate change and some 
of the plans he has to provide over $6 billion, through a combination 
of tax cuts and increased funding for research and development, to 
find ways to spur progress in new research for clean energy, 
including energy efficiency.  He'll talk a little bit about clean 
water and strengthening the clean water initiative. 

	     And finally, I think the President will also underscore 
the importance of the initiative on race and continuing the goal of 
creating a just and fair society. 

	     Finally, I'd just mention, we are approaching the 
millennium and the time has come to think about gifts to the future, 
and one of the gifts to the future I think that the President will 
propose is the creation of a 21st century research fund that would 
see a very substantial expansion in funding, particularly for 
biomedical research, that we're at a point where great breakthroughs 
may be possible in disease like cancer, and that it's wise at this 
point to make a major investment in funding.

	     Let me stop there and turn to Gene for some comments on 
Social Security. 

	     Q	  Wait a minute, before we go there, is there a price 
tag on all of these items?

	     MR. SPERLING:  Can you help me out on this one thing?  
They need me back there, so if I could do Social Security, which has 
some questions, let me get that on the table. 

	     Today is the day the President is making a fairly 
definitive statement on two of the -- perhaps two of the most major 
fiscal issues of the next several years, which is how the country 
should deal with a projected surplus and what we should do about 
long-term Social Security reform. 

	     The President essentially has a three-part message here 
related to these two issues.  Let me say that briefly, and I'm going 
to come back to the first part a bit and explain it in more detail.  
The first part is that he is going to call for, that every penny of a 
projected surplus should be saved, not spent or given away in any 
context.  All of the surplus should be saved until we have come 
forward as a country with a long-term Social Security solution. 

	     In other words, that is not saying how much exactly of 
the surplus should go to Social Security.  What it is saying is that 
all of it should be saved until you know how much of it is needed to 
help cure the long-term Social Security solvency issue.  And I think 
that that is a very major statement, both on his seriousness on 
Social Security reforms but also on maintaining the sense of fiscal 
discipline that has helped this country so much over the last several 
years.  And it's so important, not only for our prosperity, but I 
think in terms of the United States being the bulwark of financial 
confidence that it now is at this particular moment in the world 
economy.  

	     So it is a message to all sides that whatever your 
priorities are, that it's time to slow down; that we don't need a 
feeding frenzy here on the projected surplus; and that before one 
entertains how the surplus should be used, whether it is for -- 
whatever challenge it's for, that first one should see how much of it 
is needed as part of a long-term Social Security reform package.

	     Secondly, as a means of elevating the importance of 
passing long-term Social Security reform, the President will be 
elevating the importance of having several months of a national 
conversation on the importance of Social Security reform, what the 
choices are, what the challenges are.  And the President feels that 
this not only has to be elevated and he not only has to call on 
citizens to become active and informed, but that it's also very 
important that we keep this at a level at which it does not become 
politicized, that it does not become a partisan battle, but that we 
do everything we can during this time period to have a fair and 
balanced and bipartisan discussion. 

	     In order to encourage that, the President has asked the 
AARP and the Concord Coalition to cosponsor and cohost three to four 
regional forums around the country in which either himself or the 
Vice President would participate, as well as other members of his 
Cabinet and administration, and, it is our hope, key members of the 
Democrats and Republican Congress, men and women who have been 
involved in this issue.  

	     By having these two groups, the preeminent seniors' 
group and the preeminent group that is focused on deficit reduction 
and fiscal discipline cosponsor it, that will make very clear that we 
are trying to elevate this and keep an atmosphere of bipartisanship 
and civility, which was so essential to us passing the Balanced 
Budget Act of 1997.
	     
	     Q  Can I assume that they agreed to do that?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  And they have agreed to do that.  In fact 
I just saw the Concord Coalition's advisory statement.
	     
	     Q  Do you know when?  Would this be in the next year or 
over the next few months?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  It would be over the next few  -- it 
would be in 1998 and it would culminate in a White House Conference 
on Social Security at the end of the year.  
	     
	     The third element is that the President tonight will 
call on the Congressional bipartisan leadership to sit down with him 
at the beginning of next year and begin the process of hammering out 
a long-term Social Security legislative solution.  So the purpose of 
this is not simply education or elevation for its sake but to create 
an atmosphere where we can do something that the country has never 
done before, which is to confront a long-term fiscal crisis -- not 
when it became a crisis but in a preventative measure that can be 
done with more measured steps because the problem is being taken on 
early.

	     So, again, he is saying that the surplus should be 
reserved until a Social Security plan is come up with; second, that 
we should have this national conversation and work towards national 
consensus.  And, third, that this should lead to a real bipartisan 
legislative effort to get things done.  In the end, it is the key 
players in Congress and the President who have to come together if 
this is going to happen and that is who he is going to be calling on 
to work with him next January.
	     
	     What I do want to say is that one of the things I think 
is very strong about this plan is that it has a disciplining process, 
a disciplining effect in two ways.  Number one, the country has done 
very well by having this period of the fiscal discipline and by 
saying that all proposals, from all political stripes, all of them 
that use the surplus should be put on hold until we fix Social 
Security.  We are maintaining that sense of fiscal discipline, and 
we're doing it regardless of the merits of a particular proposal.  
	     
	     And, secondly, it puts pressure on the political process 
to take on this issue.  The biggest threat to Social Security reform 
is the temptation to kick it down the road year after year until your 
options become less and less, or more severe.  And what this does is 
it puts tremendous pressure on the political process to solve Social 
Security long-term challenges, by basically saying that no other 
debate on the surplus should take place until this is taken care of.
	     
	     Q	  How are you defining surplus, and where are you 
going to put the money?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  Well, in the time period that we are 
taking about, which is 1998-99, in terms of this period, what we are 
mostly trying to protect is, when the budgets come out you will see 
that the projected surpluses over the next five years amount to $200 
billion.  And our interest is to prevent legislation that would spend 
that money, whether it's on spending or tax cuts, that would spend 
that money before we know how much of that surplus is needed, along 
with other measures to be part of a long-term Social Security reform 
package.  That is the element.
	     
	     Technically, we just have, if you have a surplus during 
this time period and there is not legislation, a surplus -- what 
would happen automatically now is that money would go to paying down 
the debt.  And that is still, in a sense, saving the money and, as my 
colleague would say, whether the money is being saved as part of the 
reducing the debt or Social Security, it still has the same impact in 
terms of national savings.
	     
	     But by reserving that, those funds and the future, 
surplus funds, you are ensuring that if some of those are needed to 
be part of a long-term Social Security package, we are ensuring that 
those surpluses would not be dissipated before we have even had a 
chance to look at Social Security.  Or, put another way, what we are 
really saying is the President said he had a two-part obligation of 
fiscal discipline.  One was to balance the budget, and second was to 
look at long-term issues like Social Security.  
	     
	     And we're saying, before we engage in a debate on other 
uses for the surplus, let's see how much of this is needed as part of 
a long-term Social Security reform.
	     
	     Q  Would we be accurate in describing -- until the 
Social Security problem is solved, all surpluses should go towards 
reducing the national debt -- paying off the national debt?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  Let me say the following:  I, we would 
say that until the Social Security is solved, the funds should not, 
people should not spend the tax -- excuse me -- not spend the surplus 
on their priorities.  Whether, down the road -- what you could be 
asking is, hypothetically, if Social Security reform didn't happen, 
and the surplus started to accumulate, if we wanted at some point, it 
would be conceivable that you could do legislation that could somehow 
hold that in some way for Social Security.  
	     
	     We're hoping not to have to confront that situation 
because our aim is to get this done in '98 or '99.  In the absence of 
that, the money would automatically just pay down the debt, which is 
still saving money in a sense,  But, again, our main focus is to say 
none of this should be spent on either tax cut or spending proposal, 
until we have seen how much is needed to cure long-term Social 
Security --
	     
	     Q  It would go to pay down the debt.
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  This is obviously one of the most 
confusing topics, and it is not just -- I'm not just saying 
confusing, it's confusing for anybody and everybody.  But let me just 
explain what I mean.  If Social Security -- when we say money should 
be saved to see if it's needed for Social Security, we envision that 
some part of the surplus would probably be needed to help the Social 
Security trust fund; in other words, that some of the savings would 
go to the Social Security trust fund as part of a long-term Social 
Security reform.
	     
	     So we do envision the possibility that when people come 
up with a long-term Social Security plan, that part of their 
solutions will be to use some of the savings from the surplus to help 
strengthen the Social Security trust fund.  We're not making a 
decision at this moment how much or what percentage.  We're just 
saying that all of it should essentially be protected from being 
spent or tax-cut away until you see how much of that.  

	     
	     Now, a second question is, well, what if Social Security 
reform didn't happen as quickly as you'd like -- what would happen 
then.  One of two things: you would then either let the surpluses 
under current law accumulate, and they would reduce down the debt; or 
one could at that point have some form of legislation which in some 
way kept open the possibility that that could be used for Social 
Security.  But, again, the major amounts of the surplus are not 
projected to happen in '98 and '99.
	     
	     Q  In that the Republicans already have other ideas on 
the surplus, what makes you think they would go along with this.
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  Because I think that this is a powerful 
message by the President of the United States to people of all 
political stripes on both sides of the aisle.  He's saying, whatever 
your priorities are, we should put Social Security first, and that's 
how he'll describe it in his speech tonight.  He'll say we need to 
put Social Security first.  We have to take care --
	     
	     Q  Is that a quote?  Is he going to say, put Social 
Security first -- is he going to say that? 
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  That's what he will say in the State of 
the Union tonight.
	     
	     Q  Thanks.
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  I think that it is -- or we're looking 
real bad.  I'm looking real bad.

	     I think the reason why this will have a lot of power is 
because it is a message that average Americans would understand.  
Everybody understands the notion that when you have a certain amount 
of savings, that you have to do what you have to do before you do 
what you want to do.  And part of what we have had to do for our five 
years there is reduce the deficit.  That's not what we prefer to do.  
We prefer to be investing in education, but part of what we had to 
do, part of the challenge we face, is we had to do things like invest 
in education at the same time we brought down the deficit. 
	     
	     And, what we're saying now is part of what else we have 
to do is still be able to make progress on things while taking care 
of another fiscal challenge, which is the generational deficit 
entailed in Social Security reform.

	     And so I think that that will be a powerful message.  
It's a message that will go to anybody.  And let me say honestly, 
this is a disciplining device, not just on Democrats and Republicans, 
it's a disciplining device on us.
	     
	     Q  How is it a disciplining device when the tax payer 
may take out of this, all you're doing is taking $200 billion more 
from them when they could be getting back something in tax cuts while 
you guys try to figure out how to save Social Security?  Why 
shouldn't people get some sort of cash back or some sort of a tax cut 
if we're talking such a high figure. 
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  That is a debate that we may very well 
have.  And what we will argue is that Social Security right now is 
not funded for the long term.  Younger people rightly believe that 
Social Security will not be there in the strong form for them in 
their retirement years.  And we're saying that, sure, tax cuts are 
nice.  Everybody likes tax cuts.  But our view is that you had to do 
it in a fiscally responsible context.
	     
	     When we proposed targeted tax cuts, we have paid for 
them.  And what we're saying -- and if others want to propose tax 
cuts and pay for them  -- I want to make this clear -- if others want 
to propose tax cuts or spending initiatives       


	     I want to make this clear:  if others want to propose 
tax cuts or spending initiatives different from what we have and pay 
for them with different offsets or use some of the offsets we have -- 
we might disagree with that policy-wise, but that would be consistent 
with this approach.  What we are saying is that before you go using 
the surplus, before you go saying, I don't have to pay for my 
initiative, I'm going to use the surplus, they should not give the 
impression to the American people that that is just free money.  
Those are savings that are very much needed to help solve Social 
Security.  
	     
	     And we're going to say, not that that surplus couldn't 
go to other things down the road, but that you should save Social 
Security first and make sure that you have the surplus, that the 
savings from the surplus are at least held until we see how much of 
it is needed for Social Security.  I think that will be a strong 
case.  Certainly, some will say, no, we shouldn't hold that money for 
Social Security, we should spend it on a tax cut or spend it on a 
spending project, and we will argue our side.
	     
	     Q	  Have you checked with some of the Democratic 
leadership in Congress, and what kind of reaction do you have from 
them to this proposal?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  Well, I should say this is the best kept 
secret we've ever had.  And part of that was that we haven't had as 
broad consultation as one might often have.  We started this process 
I guess in early October.  I would say actually around November 26th 
is when we decided on some form of the Social Security first plan.  
However, this is technical and we wanted to play through every option 
and we locked this in in the beginning of January.
	     
	     After that, the President called in a variety of 
different members and asked their views on surplus and Social 
Security.  And I think we felt very confident after hearing that, 
from the things they were saying, that they would at least feel that 
our proposal was very consistent with what they want.  I think that 
many -- I'm very hopeful that many Democrats and Republicans will 
think this is a wise thing to do.  But this is something the 
President felt very strongly about, the Vice President felt strongly 
about, his economic team felt strongly about.  And this is the policy 
we believe in.
	     
	     But I think that we have -- from what we've heard in our 
conversation with people, I think we have good reason to believe that 
this will have a strong degree of support.
	     
	     Q	  Gene, a technical question on this.  Does this 
mean, then, that you need some legislation, because if you just let 
the surplus accumulate in the absence of an appropriation it will go 
toward the debt.  So do you have to ask Congress to create -- is this 
like an escrow fund?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  Two parts -- I'm going back.  If as part 
of Social Security reform you wanted to use some of the surplus for 
Social Security --
	     
	     Q	  No, no, stop.  You're going ahead.  The surplus 
starts; you're going to say this tonight; money is coming in; you're 
putting it in a separate fund -- I mean, be a bookkeeper a second.  
Do you need legislation to keep this money untouchable so it doesn't 
go into the debt?  Because you have said if nothing happened it would 
go towards the debt.
	     

	     MR. SPERLING:  I think that if what you're talking about 
is a few billion dollars of surplus -- which is probably the most we 
project over the next couple of years -- I don't know if it -- I 
think that the fact that it would go to paying down the debt it would 
still essentially be saved is a -- would not be a major problem.
	     
	     I think the question is if there were larger surpluses 
that looked like they were going to accumulate more than we thought, 
then if we decided at that time we wanted to in some way save them, 
then I think, yes, we would need some form of legislation.  We have 
not crossed that bridge because we are hopeful we won't have to.  
We're hopeful that we'll be able to have Social Security reform 
before a significant amount of surplus starts to accumulate.
	     
	     Q	  Why will it take a year, then?  Is it to get it 
past the election?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  I think that we have -- I have personally 
consulted with almost every group that's interested in Social 
Security reform about how they looked at the coming year.  There was 
remarkable consensus on the following:  that Social Security reform 
would never pass unless the issue was elevated and raised at a high 
level.  And that, secondly, if it became politicized too quickly, 
before Americans were informed about it, if people started taking off 
options and taking untenable positions prior to the election, that 
that would make it difficult in a post-election period to have the 
kind of bipartisan atmosphere.
	     
	     So I think that we -- I think that, obviously, if things 
were to come together in a way that we had an opportunity to address 
this problem this year, and things worked out that way, we would 
obviously support that.  But it is the opinion of almost everybody 
dealing on this issue across the board that the best way to proceed 
is to try to educate people and keep people from politicizing this 
issue and taking options off the table during this period, so that 
following the election we would have the kind of atmosphere where the 
options are open, where people are still working together and we 
might have the type of atmosphere we had in '97, where we could do 
something.
	     
	     And that is why the President has taken the extra effort 
of rather than us simply hosting forums ourselves, of getting two 
groups that we think together people will trust, we'll be able to 
present a balanced and bipartisan presentation.
	     
	     Q	  Gene, in his speech will he use any sort of 
empirical evidence to make this point?  I mean, how much of a 
shortfall and how many people are we talking about who would -- the 
system, as it stands now, if we do nothing would be left out of 
getting benefits?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  I think just in terms of words on the 
speech, I think that he's going to go -- honestly, it was more wordy 
at a while, and I think that, as you'll see, the President, Saturday 
-- Saturday, the President cut out a lot of fine language.
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Very expensive 
language, he cut out.  (Laughter.)
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  And I think he goes more quickly to it 
and he tries to focus more on the surplus and what's best to do with 
it.  So I don't think that you'll see an exposition of the trust fund 
goes bankrupt in this year.  But what we've done is set up a 
process --
	     
	     Q	  So you don't have any chart information for me is 
what you're saying?  
	     

	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  No, President Perot did 
not bring his charts.  (Laughter.)
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  We could provide you with some of that 
information.  He's not going to go into all of that in his speech 
tonight.
	     
	     Q	  It's the President's centerpiece of the speech, 
though; is that correct?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  I think that we have -- I mean, we 
started early on this in October because this was always our plan.  
Our plan was always that we could have a major statement on surplus 
and Social Security at this time.  The meetings in my office were 
very cramped, but we kept them there -- we kept them there, we had 
good coffee.  But we kept a tight lid and we had a small group that 
worked on it.  We met about five times with the President, probably 
starting in October, and closed in -- we had the last two meetings I 
guess the first two Mondays we were back in January.
	     
	     Q	  -- three or four key facts that substantiate the 
threat that you're addressing with this proposal?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  Well, in the year 2012, the amount of 
money coming in on a cash flow basis -- she's checking me --
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  All right, I like that.  
(Laughter.)
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  -- my colleague is checking me, I'm 
getting my grade -- on a cash flow basis will start to be less than 
that that has to be paid out for benefits.  Then by 2019 it becomes 
less than is accumulating in -- what's being paid out becomes less 
than what is coming in, plus the interest.  And at that point the 
trust fund, itself, starts going down until the year 2029, in which 
there is then -- then the trust fund is depleted.
	     
	     Q	  2019?
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  2029.
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  That's right.
	     
	     Q	  Will there be anything left in the trust fund by 
2029?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  No.
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  No, it's depleted.  But 
there are still revenues coming into the system, of course.  And 
estimates are that those revenues would be sufficient to pay 75 
percent, roughly, of promised benefits, even after the trust fund is 
depleted.
	     
	     Q	  If you could put every penny you needed today --
	     
	     Q	  Between 2012 and 2029 you expect 75 percent of 
benefits?
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  No, I'm sorry.  In 2029 
the trust fund is depleted.  And if absolutely nothing were done at 
all until that moment -- which, of course, is the opposite of what we 
anticipate -- come 2029, I'm saying there would still be sufficient 
revenue flowing into the fund to pay 75 percent, roughly, of promised 
benefits.  
	     
	     Now, we want to see action taken early.  I'm just trying 
to scale what happens in 2029 in the absence of any type of --

	     
	     Q	  Robert Reich said recently that those projections 
are not correct, because it's based on too pessimistic growth 
estimates.
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  What's that? 
	     
	     Q	  Robert Reich said recently that the projections 
that it would go bankrupt are non-accurate because they're based on 
growth estimates that are too pessimistic.
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  There's a lot of confusion about the 
long-term growth number, because as my colleague has taught me, the 
GDP growth is a combination of both productivity growth and the 
increase in the work force.  And what a lot of people don't realize 
is because there are projected to be virtually no growth in the work 
force, people who say, well, the economy could grow three percent or 
something at that time are actually then talking about a full three 
percent productivity growth -- which is exactly the kind of absolute, 
wild, optimistic assumptions that got us into this trouble in the 
first place.  We've had conservative assumptions the last five years 
and this economy has benefitted strongly from it.
	     
	     Q	  Gene, is this a concession that Social Security 
--that you're going to have to pay something to repair it, that it 
can't repair itself.
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  You bet.
	     
	     Q	  And, also, is this a big enough program, this 
announcement tonight, along with the other 49 points in the speech, 
to grab the nation's attention away from the sex scandal?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  I would be surprised if there is much 
that makes people stop caring about Social Security, that makes 
people stop being worried about whether they have health care, the 
education of their kids or whether there's a threat from Iraq, or 
about crime, or about the environment.  I mean, these are the things 
people care about.  These are the things the President was elected to 
deal with . 
	     
	     And I think this is perhaps the most interesting speech 
that we've given, because I think the issues -- from cloning to 
Social Security to Iraq -- are interesting; and I think they are the 
important things people care about and I think the speech will go 
over very well.
	     
	     Q	  How long do you expect it to be?
	     
	     Q	  Is that on the record, Gene?  Can we use that? 
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  Sure.
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  It should run at or 
under an hour -- if the over and under is at an hour, I would bet 
under.
	     
	     Q	  Is it still the President's intention not to 
mention in any way the scandal?
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Right.  Yes.
	     
	     Q	  Just a couple specific questions on some of these 
other proposals.  In the Juvenile Justice Crime Bill, the measure 
that I gather would -- I gather from what you say in here, you 
wouldn't let kids who were juvenile delinquents buy guns when they're 
21?
	     

	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  It would extend the 
Brady Bill down.
	     
	     Q	  Okay.  So is that a new proposal, or has he said 
that?  
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  I don't know.  Gene, 
has he been asked that before?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  What's that?  I'm sorry.  
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  The juvenile gun 
provision.  We're getting into --
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  My colleague's issue.
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  I'm sorry, I don't 
know.  We can find out.
	     
	     Q	  And also on the environmental, the global climate 
change, is he going to sort of do some preaching on that?  I mean, is 
he going to urge -- I mean, can you kind of characterize how he's 
going to talk about --
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  What he's going to remind people is that 
virtually every time in this country there's been an effort to make a 
major environmental reform or improvement, people have said the 
economy would go under, all sorts of bad things would have happened.  
And he's going to point out that at every stage we have been able to 
pass the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act. 
	     
	     And where are we after all the dire predictions?  We 
have the lowest unemployment and inflation in 30 years and we have 
probably the strongest economy in a generation.  So I think he'll 
make very strongly the point that there's compelling science, that we 
need to deal with this and that we've always heard the dire 
predictions and we've always found a way to both grow the economy and 
improve the environment.
	     
	     Q	  What will the President say about the Asian 
financial crisis?  Will he say more than we have to pay the IMF so we 
have to conduct its bail-out?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  He is going to speak to that and he is 
going to -- it's obviously a complex issue, but he's going to try, in 
very plain language, to tell people why what's happening there 
matters to us, why the fact that currencies are falling could mean 
that there are goods coming in at lower prices that could have some 
disruptive effects here, why it could hurt our ability to export; but 
that it is in our interest, when countries are willing to take the 
tough measures of reforms, that it's in our interest to give them the 
opportunity to at least try, because of the interdependence between 
the strength of their economies and the strength of our economy.
	     
	     Q	  Anything specifically on the role of Japan, in 
restoring stability to Asia, as Bob Rubin did in his Georgetown 
speech and Tom Foley, Ambassador to Japan, did in Tokyo?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  This is going to be a two-hour speech by 
the -- (laughter.)
	     
	     Q	  Would you go on the record with one of your quotes?  
Perhaps the, it's much more old-new rather than left-right?  
	     
	     Q	  And the Clintonism --

	     
	     MR. BEGALA:  That's fine.
	     
	     Q	  Gene, what are we going to hear on minimum wage, 
please?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  The President is going to announce today 
that he is going to increase the minimum wage.  But we are going to 
wait until -- I don't want to lock us in, but maybe next week, how's 
that -- to announce the number.  He's not going to announce our 
specific proposal today, only that we are going to call for an 
increase in the minimum wage.
	     
	     Q	  Back about Iraq --
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  He's made America's 
position on it very clear and I think you'll see a very clear 
restatement of it.
	     
	     Q	  I mean, what information -- use today to reaffirm 
his position -- more specific --
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  I think you'll see 
tonight a firm restating of our position.
	     
	     Q	  Gene -- IMF funding issue?
	     
	     Q	  I'm sorry, could you finish what you were saying, 
please, about Iraq?
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  -- our position very 
clear.
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  -- mention as part of the Asian finance 
crisis.  I really have to go.
	     
	     Q	  Can we put on the record, this is the best kept 
secret we ever had, Gene?  Is that okay?
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  What's that? 
	     
	     Q	  This is the best kept secret we ever had -- that's 
on the record?  All in favor, all opposed?  (Laughter.)
	     
	     SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Gene and his team kept 
this quiet for three or four months.  
	     
	     MR. SPERLING:  You can use anything I said on the 
record.  
	     
             END                          3:52 P.M. EST
 Link to FirstGov.gov: U.S. Government portal Privacy Policy | Website Policies & Other Important Information | Site Map
Need Larger Text?