Hearing Office Average Processing Time Ranking Report
FY 2011 (For Reporting Purposes: 9/25/2010 Through 03/25/2011)

A ranking of the 157 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of days until final disposition of the hearing request. The average shown will be a combined average for all cases completed in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category.

National Ranking Report
By Average Processing Time
Fiscal YTD Ending: 03/25/2011
Workdays: 122

Rank Hearing Office Region Processing Time
1
MAYAGUEZ
02
184
2
PONCE
02
198
3
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX *
06
201
4
SHREVEPORT
06
238
5
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN
06
241
6
KINGSPORT
04
260
7
MIDDLESBORO
04
268
8
PADUCAH
04
271
9
COVINGTON GA
04
272
10
BROOKLYN
02
274
11
FAYETTEVILLE NC
04
275
12
HUNTINGTON
03
277
12
MCALESTER
06
277
14
FORT WORTH
06
279
15
ALEXANDRIA
06
284
15
FORT SMITH
06
284
15
LIVONIA MI
05
284
18
ELKINS PARK
03
285
19
NORFOLK
03
287
20
SAN ANTONIO
06
289
21
CHARLOTTESVILLE
03
295
22
HOUSTON-BISSONNET
06
296
23
METAIRIE
06
297
24
DALLAS NORTH
06
298
25
DOVER
03
299
25
KNOXVILLE
04
299
27
CHATTANOOGA
04
301
27
ATLANTA NORTH
04
301
29
CREVE COEUR
07
303
30
VALPARAISO IN
05
305
30
CHARLOTTE
04
305
32
NEW ORLEANS
06
306
33
RICHMOND
03
307
34
EVANSTON
05
308
35
DALLAS DOWNTOWN
06
309
36
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN
04
311
37
GREENVILLE
04
312
38
EVANSVILLE
05
313
39
TOPEKA KS
07
314
40
MADISON
05
316
41
LEXINGTON
04
320
41
HONOLULU
09
320
43
WEST DES MOINES
07
321
44
AKRON OH
05
322
45
HATTIESBURG
04
324
46
SAN JUAN
02
325
47
CHARLESTON SC
04
326
47
ALBUQUERQUE
06
326
47
LONG BEACH
09
326
50
HARRISBURG
03
327
51
QUEENS
02
330
51
SAVANNAH
04
330
53
SPOKANE
10
332
54
OKLAHOMA CITY
06
334
55
BOSTON
01
335
56
STOCKTON
09
337
57
WICHITA
07
338
58
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN
09
339
58
SOUTH JERSEY
02
339
60
LOS ANGELES WEST
09
344
61
SYRACUSE
02
345
62
JERICHO
02
346
63
ALBANY
02
347
64
SAN BERNARDINO
09
348
65
RALEIGH
04
349
66
PHILADELPHIA EAST
03
350
67
LITTLE ROCK
06
351
68
CHARLESTON WV
03
352
69
MACON
04
354
70
PORTLAND ME
01
355
71
PHILADELPHIA
03
357
71
TUCSON
09
357
71
TULSA
06
357
74
JACKSON
04
359
75
WILKES BARRE
03
361
76
ORANGE
09
363
77
JACKSONVILLE
04
364
78
MANCHESTER
01
365
79
SACRAMENTO
09
367
80
NEW YORK
02
368
81
DETROIT
05
369
81
DOWNEY
09
369
83
FT LAUDERDALE
04
370
84
SEVEN FIELDS
03
372
85
ROCHESTER *
02
373
86
BALTIMORE
03
374
87
TAMPA
04
377
87
MILWAUKEE
05
377
87
ORLAND PARK
05
377
90
PEORIA
05
378
91
HARTFORD
01
380
92
COLUMBIA SC
04
382
93
SPRINGFIELD MA
01
383
94
FLINT
05
384
94
SANTA BARBARA
09
384
96
PHOENIX NORTH
09
385
97
SAN DIEGO
09
386
98
PORTLAND OR
10
387
99
OAK PARK
05
389
100
MORGANTOWN
03
390
101
SAN FRANCISCO
09
391
102
PASADENA
09
392
103
FORT MYERS FL *
04
395
103
SEATTLE
10
395
105
WHITE PLAINS
02
396
105
ORLANDO
04
396
107
DENVER
08
397
107
JOHNSTOWN
03
397
109
ST PETERSBURG FL
04
401
109
SALT LAKE CITY
08
401
111
TALLAHASSE FL
04
404
112
LAS VEGAS
09
407
113
MT PLEASANT MI
05
408
113
PROVIDENCE
01
408
115
FARGO
08
410
116
MEMPHIS
04
411
117
NASHVILLE
04
412
117
SAN JOSE
09
412
119
LOUISVILLE
04
414
119
KANSAS CITY
07
414
119
SAN RAFAEL
09
414
122
FORT WAYNE
05
415
122
MOBILE
04
415
124
OAK BROOK
05
420
124
COLORADO SPRINGS
08
420
124
BILLINGS
08
420
127
CHICAGO
05
422
127
CINCINNATI
05
422
129
GREENSBORO
04
424
130
MONTGOMERY
04
427
131
MINNEAPOLIS
05
429
132
FRESNO
09
431
133
TUPELO
04
432
134
FLORENCE
04
433
135
MIAMI
04
434
136
NEW HAVEN
01
440
137
NEWARK
02
442
137
BIRMINGHAM
04
442
137
ST LOUIS
07
442
140
OAKLAND
09
444
141
WASHINGTON
03
447
142
BRONX
02
448
143
ROANOKE
03
450
143
OMAHA
07
450
145
ANCHORAGE AK
10
451
146
EUGENE
10
453
147
TOLEDO OH
05
454
148
PITTSBURGH
03
460
149
SPRINGFIELD MO
07
462
150
PHOENIX
09
471
151
GRAND RAPIDS
05
477
152
DAYTON
05
493
153
CLEVELAND
05
507
154
BUFFALO
02
509
155
INDIANAPOLIS
05
513
156
LANSING
05
524
157
COLUMBUS
05
531

* Satellite Offices reported separately from their parent office.

 

Disclaimer

These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.