Hearing Office Average Processing Time Ranking Report
FY 2011 (For Reporting Purposes: 9/25/2010 Through 07/29/2011)

A ranking of the 157 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of days until final disposition of the hearing request. The average shown will be a combined average for all cases completed in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category.

National Ranking Report
By Average Processing Time
Fiscal YTD Ending: 07/29/2011
Workdays: 210

Rank Hearing Office Region Processing Time
1
MAYAGUEZ
02
186
2
PONCE
02
188
3
SHREVEPORT
06
213
4
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX *
06
230
5
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN
06
234
6
KINGSPORT
04
253
7
PADUCAH
04
264
8
MIDDLESBORO
04
272
9
FORT SMITH
06
274
10
CHARLOTTESVILLE
03
275
11
MCALESTER
06
277
12
COVINGTON GA
04
278
13
NEW ORLEANS
06
282
13
ALEXANDRIA
06
282
15
HOUSTON-BISSONNET
06
283
15
CHATTANOOGA
04
283
17
FORT WORTH
06
285
18
ELKINS PARK
03
287
19
BROOKLYN
02
290
19
SAN ANTONIO
06
290
21
DALLAS NORTH
06
294
22
LIVONIA MI
05
295
22
VALPARAISO IN
05
295
22
NORFOLK
03
295
25
HUNTINGTON
03
296
26
KNOXVILLE
04
298
27
ATLANTA NORTH
04
299
28
METAIRIE
06
300
29
CHARLOTTE
04
301
30
GREENVILLE
04
302
30
DALLAS DOWNTOWN
06
302
32
LONG BEACH
09
303
33
LEXINGTON
04
304
34
MADISON
05
308
34
HONOLULU
09
308
36
DOVER
03
312
37
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN
04
314
38
RICHMOND
03
315
38
EVANSVILLE
05
315
38
CREVE COEUR
07
315
41
CHARLESTON SC
04
317
42
HARRISBURG
03
319
42
TOPEKA KS
07
319
44
FAYETTEVILLE NC
04
321
45
SPOKANE
10
323
46
HATTIESBURG
04
324
46
STOCKTON
09
324
46
EVANSTON
05
324
49
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN
09
325
50
BOSTON
01
330
51
SAVANNAH
04
331
52
ALBUQUERQUE
06
334
52
SAN JUAN
02
334
54
JACKSON
04
335
54
RALEIGH
04
335
54
TUCSON
09
335
57
QUEENS
02
336
58
LOS ANGELES WEST
09
337
59
ALBANY
02
338
60
WEST DES MOINES
07
339
61
JERICHO
02
341
62
LITTLE ROCK
06
343
63
SYRACUSE
02
345
64
CHARLESTON WV
03
346
64
OKLAHOMA CITY
06
346
64
OAK PARK
05
346
67
TULSA
06
347
68
SAN BERNARDINO
09
348
68
SOUTH JERSEY
02
348
68
PHILADELPHIA EAST
03
348
71
WICHITA
07
352
71
AKRON OH
05
352
71
ORANGE
09
352
74
JACKSONVILLE
04
353
75
MILWAUKEE
05
354
76
COLUMBIA SC
04
355
77
WILKES BARRE
03
357
77
MANCHESTER
01
357
77
DETROIT
05
357
77
ORLAND PARK
05
357
77
SACRAMENTO
09
357
82
MT PLEASANT MI
05
359
83
MACON
04
361
84
TAMPA
04
362
84
DOWNEY
09
362
86
PHILADELPHIA
03
363
87
PORTLAND ME
01
364
87
SAN RAFAEL
09
364
89
BALTIMORE
03
366
89
ORLANDO
04
366
91
FT LAUDERDALE
04
368
92
PEORIA
05
369
93
PHOENIX NORTH
09
371
94
SEVEN FIELDS
03
373
94
PORTLAND OR
10
373
96
SPRINGFIELD MA
01
375
97
HARTFORD
01
379
98
JOHNSTOWN
03
382
99
FORT WAYNE
05
383
99
PASADENA
09
383
101
ROCHESTER *
02
384
102
SANTA BARBARA
09
385
103
FLINT
05
386
104
LAS VEGAS
09
387
104
MORGANTOWN
03
387
104
TALLAHASSEE FL
04
387
107
SALT LAKE CITY
08
389
108
DENVER
08
390
108
NEW YORK
02
390
108
WHITE PLAINS
02
390
111
SEATTLE
10
392
112
FORT MYERS FL *
04
396
113
SAN DIEGO
09
397
113
SAN FRANCISCO
09
397
113
ANCHORAGE AK
10
397
116
MEMPHIS
04
398
117
LOUISVILLE
04
399
118
FARGO
08
400
119
PROVIDENCE
01
401
120
ST PETERSBURG FL
04
402
120
CHICAGO
05
402
122
NASHVILLE
04
407
123
BILLINGS
08
409
124
MOBILE
04
412
125
MINNEAPOLIS
05
413
126
SAN JOSE
09
415
127
CINCINNATI
05
416
128
MONTGOMERY
04
419
129
NEWARK
02
422
129
TUPELO
04
422
129
KANSAS CITY
07
422
132
MIAMI
04
424
133
WASHINGTON
03
425
133
COLORADO SPRINGS
08
425
135
FRESNO
09
426
136
NEW HAVEN
01
428
137
BRONX
02
433
138
FLORENCE
04
434
139
ST LOUIS
07
435
140
ROANOKE
03
436
141
OMAHA
07
437
142
GREENSBORO
04
439
143
OAK BROOK
05
440
144
BIRMINGHAM
04
441
145
OAKLAND
09
442
146
PHOENIX
09
451
147
PITTSBURGH
03
452
147
EUGENE
10
452
149
LANSING
05
456
150
TOLEDO OH
05
467
151
SPRINGFIELD MO
07
481
152
INDIANAPOLIS
05
482
153
GRAND RAPIDS
05
485
154
BUFFALO
02
497
155
CLEVELAND
05
503
156
COLUMBUS
05
504
156
DAYTON
05
504

* Satellite Offices reported separately from their parent office.

 

Disclaimer

These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.