www.socialsecurity.gov| Skip to content Social Security Online |
Hearings and Appeals | |
| www.socialsecurity.gov |
| Archived Public Use Files | This is an archival or historical document and may not reflect current policies or procedures | |
Public Use Files |
||
Hearing Office Dispositions Per ALJ Per Day Rate Ranking ReportFY 2012 (For Reporting Purposes: 10/01/2011 Through 10/28/2011)A ranking of the 161 ODAR hearing offices (including 3 satellite offices) by the average number of hearings dispositions per ALJ per day. The average shown will be a combined average for all ALJs working in that hearing office. Users will be able determine where a particular hearing office stands among the total with respect to this workload category. National Ranking Report
|
|
Rank
|
Hearing Office |
Region
|
ALJ Dispositions
Per Day Per ALJ |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
MAYAGUEZ |
02
|
5.87
|
|
2
|
COLUMBIA MO |
07
|
5.75
|
|
3
|
ANCHORAGE AK |
10
|
4.62
|
|
4
|
PONCE |
02
|
4.57
|
|
5
|
ALEXANDRIA |
06
|
3.89
|
|
6
|
FARGO |
08
|
3.87
|
|
7
|
FORT SMITH |
06
|
3.83
|
|
8
|
HONOLULU |
09
|
3.79
|
|
9
|
VALPARAISO IN |
05
|
3.46
|
|
10
|
CHARLESTON WV |
03
|
3.45
|
|
11
|
RIO GRANDE VALLEY TX * |
06
|
3.40
|
|
12
|
PROVIDENCE |
01
|
3.34
|
|
13
|
KINGSPORT |
04
|
3.32
|
|
13
|
MEMPHIS |
04
|
3.32
|
|
15
|
MADISON |
05
|
3.29
|
|
16
|
MCALESTER |
06
|
3.13
|
|
16
|
LAWRENCE MA |
01
|
3.13
|
|
18
|
LITTLE ROCK |
06
|
3.08
|
|
19
|
LEXINGTON |
04
|
3.07
|
|
20
|
COLORADO SPRINGS |
08
|
3.05
|
|
21
|
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN |
09
|
3.03
|
|
22
|
WILKES BARRE |
03
|
3.01
|
|
23
|
LONG BEACH |
09
|
3.00
|
|
24
|
FORT WORTH |
06
|
2.99
|
|
24
|
PHILADELPHIA EAST |
03
|
2.99
|
|
24
|
GREENVILLE |
04
|
2.99
|
|
24
|
FAYETTEVILLE NC |
04
|
2.99
|
|
24
|
TUCSON |
09
|
2.99
|
|
29
|
JACKSON |
04
|
2.97
|
|
29
|
MT PLEASANT MI |
05
|
2.97
|
|
31
|
EVANSVILLE |
05
|
2.95
|
|
31
|
GRAND RAPIDS |
05
|
2.95
|
|
31
|
SAN JOSE |
09
|
2.95
|
|
31
|
BILLINGS |
08
|
2.95
|
|
35
|
FT LAUDERDALE |
04
|
2.92
|
|
36
|
SPRINGFIELD MA |
01
|
2.88
|
|
36
|
NEWARK |
02
|
2.88
|
|
36
|
SAN BERNARDINO |
09
|
2.88
|
|
39
|
METAIRIE |
06
|
2.85
|
|
40
|
NEW YORK |
02
|
2.83
|
|
41
|
MORGANTOWN |
03
|
2.82
|
|
42
|
JOHNSTOWN |
03
|
2.81
|
|
42
|
TULSA |
06
|
2.81
|
|
42
|
LIVONIA MI |
05
|
2.81
|
|
45
|
OAK PARK |
05
|
2.80
|
|
46
|
ORLAND PARK |
05
|
2.76
|
|
47
|
AKRON OH |
05
|
2.75
|
|
47
|
RICHMOND |
03
|
2.75
|
|
47
|
FLORENCE |
04
|
2.75
|
|
50
|
SAN RAFAEL |
09
|
2.74
|
|
51
|
ATLANTA DOWNTOWN |
04
|
2.72
|
|
52
|
CHATTANOOGA |
04
|
2.71
|
|
53
|
MACON |
04
|
2.70
|
|
53
|
SEVEN FIELDS |
03
|
2.70
|
|
53
|
JERICHO |
02
|
2.70
|
|
53
|
HATTIESBURG |
04
|
2.70
|
|
53
|
MOBILE |
04
|
2.70
|
|
53
|
SHREVEPORT |
06
|
2.70
|
|
59
|
PORTLAND OR |
10
|
2.68
|
|
60
|
ELKINS PARK |
03
|
2.65
|
|
60
|
SAN ANTONIO |
06
|
2.65
|
|
60
|
STOCKTON |
09
|
2.65
|
|
63
|
EUGENE |
10
|
2.64
|
|
64
|
COVINGTON GA |
04
|
2.63
|
|
64
|
PITTSBURGH |
03
|
2.63
|
|
64
|
CHARLOTTE |
04
|
2.63
|
|
67
|
HOUSTON DOWNTOWN |
06
|
2.62
|
|
67
|
TOLEDO OH |
05
|
2.62
|
|
69
|
NEW HAVEN |
01
|
2.61
|
|
69
|
PORTLAND ME |
01
|
2.61
|
|
71
|
BROOKLYN |
02
|
2.60
|
|
71
|
HARTFORD |
01
|
2.60
|
|
71
|
WEST DES MOINES |
07
|
2.60
|
|
74
|
FORT WAYNE |
05
|
2.59
|
|
74
|
SOUTH JERSEY |
02
|
2.59
|
|
76
|
SAN JUAN |
02
|
2.58
|
|
76
|
NORFOLK |
03
|
2.58
|
|
76
|
WICHITA |
07
|
2.58
|
|
79
|
OMAHA |
07
|
2.56
|
|
80
|
TUPELO |
04
|
2.55
|
|
80
|
COLUMBIA SC |
04
|
2.55
|
|
80
|
LOS ANGELES WEST |
09
|
2.55
|
|
83
|
BALTIMORE |
03
|
2.54
|
|
83
|
BOSTON |
01
|
2.54
|
|
85
|
DAYTON |
05
|
2.52
|
|
86
|
MINNEAPOLIS |
05
|
2.50
|
|
86
|
MANCHESTER |
01
|
2.50
|
|
86
|
SYRACUSE |
02
|
2.50
|
|
89
|
KNOXVILLE |
04
|
2.49
|
|
89
|
MIDDLESBORO |
04
|
2.49
|
|
89
|
CHARLESTON SC |
04
|
2.49
|
|
92
|
RALEIGH |
04
|
2.48
|
|
93
|
TAMPA |
04
|
2.47
|
|
93
|
HARRISBURG |
03
|
2.47
|
|
95
|
PADUCAH |
04
|
2.46
|
|
96
|
NASHVILLE |
04
|
2.45
|
|
96
|
LOUISVILLE |
04
|
2.45
|
|
98
|
DOVER |
03
|
2.44
|
|
98
|
ALBANY |
02
|
2.44
|
|
98
|
ORANGE |
09
|
2.44
|
|
101
|
PHOENIX |
09
|
2.43
|
|
101
|
PEORIA |
05
|
2.43
|
|
103
|
ROANOKE |
03
|
2.42
|
|
104
|
DETROIT |
05
|
2.41
|
|
104
|
HOUSTON-BISSONNET |
06
|
2.41
|
|
106
|
ATLANTA NORTH |
04
|
2.40
|
|
106
|
ROCHESTER * |
02
|
2.40
|
|
106
|
ST PETERSBURG FL |
04
|
2.40
|
|
106
|
SAN FRANCISCO |
09
|
2.40
|
|
106
|
SPOKANE |
10
|
2.40
|
|
106
|
BRONX |
02
|
2.40
|
|
112
|
DALLAS DOWNTOWN |
06
|
2.39
|
|
112
|
NEW ORLEANS |
06
|
2.39
|
|
112
|
DENVER |
08
|
2.39
|
|
115
|
OAK BROOK |
05
|
2.38
|
|
116
|
SAVANNAH |
04
|
2.37
|
|
116
|
TOPEKA KS |
07
|
2.37
|
|
116
|
TACOMA WA |
10
|
2.37
|
|
116
|
SALT LAKE CITY |
08
|
2.37
|
|
120
|
CREVE COEUR |
07
|
2.36
|
|
121
|
MONTGOMERY |
04
|
2.33
|
|
122
|
SACRAMENTO |
09
|
2.32
|
|
122
|
BIRMINGHAM |
04
|
2.32
|
|
124
|
INDIANAPOLIS |
05
|
2.31
|
|
124
|
ALBUQUERQUE |
06
|
2.31
|
|
126
|
FLINT |
05
|
2.30
|
|
127
|
OKLAHOMA CITY |
06
|
2.29
|
|
127
|
TALLAHASSEE FL |
04
|
2.29
|
|
127
|
WASHINGTON |
03
|
2.29
|
|
130
|
CLEVELAND |
05
|
2.26
|
|
131
|
HUNTINGTON |
03
|
2.25
|
|
132
|
CHARLOTTESVILLE |
03
|
2.24
|
|
132
|
MILWAUKEE |
05
|
2.24
|
|
134
|
JACKSONVILLE |
04
|
2.22
|
|
135
|
WHITE PLAINS |
02
|
2.21
|
|
135
|
FRESNO |
09
|
2.21
|
|
137
|
SANTA BARBARA |
09
|
2.20
|
|
137
|
ORLANDO |
04
|
2.20
|
|
139
|
PHOENIX NORTH |
09
|
2.18
|
|
140
|
PHILADELPHIA |
03
|
2.17
|
|
141
|
SEATTLE |
10
|
2.14
|
|
142
|
DOWNEY |
09
|
2.13
|
|
143
|
GREENSBORO |
04
|
2.12
|
|
144
|
DALLAS NORTH |
06
|
2.10
|
|
144
|
JERSEY CITY |
02
|
2.10
|
|
146
|
KANSAS CITY |
07
|
2.09
|
|
147
|
PASADENA |
09
|
2.07
|
|
148
|
LANSING |
05
|
2.05
|
|
149
|
ST LOUIS |
07
|
2.02
|
|
150
|
EVANSTON |
05
|
1.98
|
|
151
|
LAS VEGAS |
09
|
1.97
|
|
152
|
MIAMI |
04
|
1.94
|
|
153
|
FORT MYERS FL * |
04
|
1.92
|
|
154
|
CHICAGO |
05
|
1.91
|
|
155
|
OAKLAND |
09
|
1.90
|
|
156
|
COLUMBUS |
05
|
1.88
|
|
157
|
CINCINNATI |
05
|
1.72
|
|
157
|
SAN DIEGO |
09
|
1.72
|
|
159
|
BUFFALO |
02
|
1.58
|
|
160
|
SPRINGFIELD MO |
07
|
1.41
|
|
161
|
QUEENS |
02
|
1.20
|
Disclaimer: These data are being made publicly available for research purposes. Any findings and conclusions derived from analyses of these data are attributable to the researcher(s) and do not reflect those of the Social Security Administration.
 |
Privacy Policy | Website Policies & Other Important Information | Site Map |