Acquiescence Rulings Eighth Circuit Court Table of Contents
AR 87-4(8): Iamarino v. Heckler,
795 F.2d 59 (8th Cir. 1986) Positive Presumption of Substantial
Gainful Activity (SGA) for Sheltered Work (Rescinded
8/10/2000)
AR 88-6(8): Levings v. Califano,
604 F.2d 591 (8th Cir. 1979) Definition of an Inmate of a Public
Institution — Title XVI of the Social Security Act
AR 93-6(8): Brewster on Behalf of
Keller v. Sullivan, 972 F.2d 898 (8th Cir. 1992)—
Interpretation of the Secretary's Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security Act (Rescinded
7/14/95)
AR 98-1 (8): Newton v. Chater,
92 F.3d 688 (8th Cir. 1996) — Entitlement to Trial Work Period
Before Approval of an Award for Benefits and Before Twelve Months Have
Elapsed Since Onset of Disability — Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act (Rescinded 6/10/2002)
AR 98-2 (8): Sird v. Chater, 105
F.3d 401 (8th Cir. 1997) — Mental Retardation — What
Constitutes an Additional and Significant Work-Related Limitation of
Function — Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act
(Rescinded 9/20/2000)
AR 98-5(8): State of Minnesota v.
Apfel, 151 F.3d 742 (8th Cir. 1998) — Coverage for Employees
Under a Federal-State Section 218 Agreement or Modification and
Application of the Student Services Exclusion From Coverage to Services
Performed by Medical Residents — Title II of the Social Security
Act
AR 99-2(8): Kerns v. Apfel, 160
F.3d 464 (8th Cir. 1998) — Definition of Highly Marketable Skills
for Individuals Close to Retirement Age — Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act. (Rescinded 5/8/2000)
AR 12-1(8): Petersen v. Astrue, 633
F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National Guard Technicial Who Worked in
Noncovered Employment is Exempt from the Windfall Eliminiation Provision
(WEP)—Title II of the Social Security Act.
Back to Acquiescence Rulings Table of Contents
|