Last Update: 9/13/05 (Transmittal I-4-15)
DECISION AFTER COURT REMAND CASE ANALYSIS/AC RECOMMENDATION FORM
|
INITIAL/DATE | |
|
CLAIMANT |
ANALYST |
|
W/E |
MSS |
|
SSN - - |
“A” AAJ |
|
JURIS |
“B” AAJ |
|
CA# |
OTHER |
|
COURT REMANDED UNDER:
|
|
EXCEPTIONS RECEIVED:
Prior Notice Required:
|
ACTION RECOMMENDED: Invoke Own Motion Authority to Assume Jurisdiction and
PRIOR NOTCE REQUIRED |
Technical Considerations:
Insured Status Requirements
N/A
Fully insured to
20/40 met to
Special insured status requirements met (age 31, etc.)
Work After EOD
None indicated by evidence (including E/R) or testimony
Evaluated by ALJ; appropriate findings made
Other (describe in detail here)
Prior Application Subject to Reopening
N/A
ALJ declined reopening
Other (describe fully here)
Procedural Considerations:
Evidence received on remand proffered
N/A
Yes
No
ALJ appropriately dealt with requests for cross-examination, further production of evidence, etc.
N/A
Yes
No
Medical development complete
Yes
No (identify any pertinent outstanding records known to exist)
Substantial evidence in support of later onset
N/A
Yes (Exhibits)
No
Substantial evidence in support of unfavorable aspect of decision
|
|
|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Analysis:
Court remand for: (Describe specifics of the order and anything in the AC's remand order.)
Action on remand to ALJ: (Describe supplemental hearing, expert testimony, medical development, non-medical development.)
ALJ decision: (Describe findings, particularly those pertinent to the court and AC remand orders.)
Exceptions: (Describe them fully and state what action they require.)
Applicable Circuit Court Considerations:
Opinion evidence
Pain
Credibility
Acquiescence issue
Medical development standards
Need for VE testimony
Other considerations: (Describe any deficiencies in decision, any class action problem, any other handicap to defensibility.)
Recommendation: